Don't Marry

Why Modern, Western Marriage Has Become A Bad Business Decision For Men


with 4,988 comments

The intent of this website is to help educate men about
the realities of today’s modern marriage. Please pass the word.

Why Modern, Western Marriage Has Become A Bad Business Decision For Men

This writing seeks to educate men about the realities of what they may be getting into when they marry a Western Woman. An informed decision is less likely to be one that may be regretted later in the marriage. The intent is not to dissuade men from marrying, but to encourage them to communicate frankly their concerns and expectations regarding marriage with their potential spouses. The secondary aim of this essay is to enlighten women to a few of the reasons why increasingly larger numbers of successful, eligible, unmarried men, who would otherwise prefer monogamous long-term relationships, are turning their backs on marriage.

Society typically paints a negative stereotype of men who hesitate, delay, or elect not to marry.

They are labeled as either:

A) Womanisers who are unable to participate in a long term relationship, or
B) Selfish, childish or irresponsible men who can not take care of themselves or another person.

No other explanation is ever explored.

The cost of proclaiming your undying love

In University, in professional sports, in politics, in the workplace; women have the same educational and professional career opportunities as men. Contrary to commonly believed feminist propaganda, women do indeed get paid the same salary as men, given that they are willing to work the same types of jobs as men, and work as many hours as the men do. Despite this reality, many women come into marriage with very few assets, and often are saddled with substantial quantities of debt. In general, men are the ones who save and invest. Don’t believe me? Count the number of women of marrying age that you know who subscribe to financial services magazines or newspapers. A significant number of 20-something and 30-something women spend all of their disposable income on luxury rental apartments, upscale restaurants, frequent exotic vacations, leased cars, spa treatments, and excessive amounts of clothing, purses, shoes and accessories. Yet ironically, in the media, men are the ones who are portrayed as reckless, irresponsible spendthrifts.

When marriage enters the picture, double standards and financial imbalances leave responsible men to pick up the slack and fix the mess she may have made of her finances. Men are forced to spend their hard-earned savings, or take out an usurious loan, on a diamond ring. Women justify this relatively recent, mid-20th Century ritual, which was spawned by a brilliant 1940’s mass-brainwashing campaign launched by DeBeers, by insisting that a man wants to buy her a diamond and that it makes him proud to be able to proclaim his love and affection towards her in this fashion. Granted there are some men who may be inclined to declare their commitment to a life-long partner in this way, but there are plenty of men whom seek a lifelong partnership and commitment who have no interest in buying diamonds. What choice do these men have? None! To many young men, the ring, catered wedding, and honeymoon in an exotic locale at a five-star hotel is an unwelcome land mine on their journey towards adult financial stability and independence. To add insult to injury, he is now locked into a lifetime of insurance payments for this grossly overpriced jewelry. Contrary to popularly held belief diamonds are not rare at all, but instead are common and inexpensive. Their high price is due to their supply having been artificially manipulated. Some men are more concerned with realising their dream of owning a home and becoming financially stable enough to begin a family and responsibly provide for their welfare. Men worry about these matters, because, ultimately, it becomes their sole responsibility.

The purchase of the diamond ring is a predictor of things to come. Immediately after buying it, the man may be rewarded with bridal demands to finance all or part of a lavish wedding, depending upon the size of his bank account and the ambitions of his fiancée. The average costs of today’s Western Weddings frequently exceed that of a house down payment or, in certain parts of the world, the entire cost of the house itself. If a man enters a marriage having saved up a down payment for his dream home, it can suddenly be snatched right out from underneath him. Many men may object to spending such a large sum of money on what is basically a very expensive one-day, four-hour party. He also will be spending a year of his life planning it, when he could use the same time to further his career or education. However, what a man wants is really not of any concern anymore at this point in the proceedings. His wants, desires, hopes and dreams are ignored almost in their entirety. Her opinions regarding the wedding are frequently non-negotiable. A wedding is no longer an event that is equally for the bride and groom. As many of today’s Bridezilla’s will gleefully remind you, “Today is MY day!”. This gives her licence to become selfish, irresponsible, demanding and childlike. A man who balks at spending his entire life savings, or shouldering a five-figure debt load, for the ring, catered wedding and honeymoon in an exotic locale at a five-star hotel, can and will be labeled as a selfish cheapskate or not a “Real Man”. If a woman leaves such a man for him suggesting that they try to keep their costs under control, she would have the full support of everyone around her as she dumped him.

“She can do better”, “Clearly, he doesn’t love her”, “He doesn’t deserve her”, and similar sentiments will be muttered in quiet circles just out of his earshot. This is a sign of her good self-esteem and healthy self-image, and a sign that she won’t settle for anything less. She is the poster girl for the Modern, Independent Woman.

Imagine if a man demanded equal treatment and asked that she buy him a new bass boat, and a two-week bear hunt in Siberia as a condition of marriage. This would be viewed as absurd, yet women do it every day. Modern Western Marriage is supposedly an equal partnership, isn’t it?

The injustices go from bad to worse when children enter the picture. If he can afford to carry the entire familial financial burden, the woman may now elect to stop working entirely. She will often make this decision regardless of how he may feel about it. The day she stops working is the day that all of her past financial baggage unequivocally gets tossed onto his shoulders. If the woman has racked up substantial credit card debts, these are now his payments to make; if the woman has not bothered to pay off her student loans, these become his responsibility; if she owes an enormous sum on her luxury car note, it is up to him to pay it off. Irony of ironies is that he is now paying for her degree and she isn’t even working anymore! Can he object? Can he say: “No Honey, you made your mess, and it should not be my job to clean it up. You knew that you wanted kids even before you met me, and you should have planned ahead.” No, he cannot. The payments can’t be deferred until she is once again able to continue repaying them herself, not if he wants to retain a clean credit rating to get a loan for their dream home. If he even suggested that she return to work to pay off some of her own debt load, he opens himself to criticisms of being an unsupportive husband and bad father who is endangering the welfare of his children. Now the noose tightens and the responsible husband compensates for the mother’s freewheeling and irresponsible past, and begins slowly to pay off her old debts. In the most twisted turn of events yet, the debt he is paying off may often be on credit cards used to finance Vacations, Hotel Rooms and Christmas gifts shared with previous husbands, boyfriends, fiancés and lovers. Caveat Emptor! This is the reward for today’s man who works hard, makes sacrifices, plans ahead, and invests wisely. By getting married to the typical Modern, Western Woman, the man is certainly susceptible to being railroaded into this situation, because it is completely acceptable within today’s gender roles and societal norms.

Marriage can mean career slavery

Anyone who says, “Slavery is dead” clearly has not contemplated the predicament of the average Western Husband, where a good paycheck can mean career slavery. Merriam-Webster’s English Dictionary defines slavery as “…(T)he state of a person who is a chattel (an item of tangible movable or immovable property) of another person.” If the husband earns enough to support both of them, he would be hard pressed to make an argument to preserve equality and have her continue working as he does. If the wife decides to stop working, the man who has been left holding the financial bag finds his options very limited. He may find himself working in a career that he hates, for abusive and exploitative management, excessively long hours, in a position that is physically dangerous or demanding, in an organisation that has no growth potential, far away from home. At this point, considering the corner he’s been painted into, he is often powerless to affect any positive, meaningful change in his own life. He may have been harbouring delusions that once his wife was able to return to work, he would be able to gain some flexibility to rectify some of the shortcomings in his own career. Perhaps changing careers or accepting a lower salary at a different firm in exchange for better hours, a shorter commute, or more fulfilling work. Nevertheless, the distinct reality is that he will continue to shoulder the financial responsibilities of his family alone. His reward for working hard and getting ahead is to become trapped into his career, and become a specialised beast of burden to an emotionally and financially dependent family. Does it really pay to work hard anymore and apply oneself to his full potential?

If she stops working, she may never work again.

There are many debates about the merits of a stay-at-home mother vs. a working mother. My goal here is to simply educate the prospective husband on frequently unseen risks he is taking on when he agrees to accept 100% of the financial burden to allow his wife to stay at home. An informed decision is less likely to be one that may be regretted later in the marriage.

Every parent will agree that staying home with children is backbreaking and often mind-numbing labour. Many new fathers may concede that it is much easier to go to work than to stay at home with several children. However, the greatest imbalance in efforts and contributions to a marriage can manifest once all of the children are of school age. The house is now empty from 8am-3pm. The wife has 7 hours to herself while the kids are at school and the husband is at work. After a few years of hard work at home, many wives may feel entitled to “kick back” and take it easy. The good, supportive husband, however, has worked those same years, has done his 50/50 of the housework, and is still working just as hard to support the family once the kids are in school. His workload has not diminished, and it may have even increased as her expectations rise. He is rarely afforded the same option to scale back his daytime efforts.

What motivation does the modern wife have to return to work? Very little. For several years now, the man’s salary has been enough to live on. Otherwise, she would have been working to make ends meet. Unless tight finances dictate that she must return to work, the husband really has little say in this matter. The wife can hide behind many different excuses in order not to work, despite having little to do from 8am-3pm. Among the commonest are:

“I’m busy with the housework”
It is easy to exaggerate the labours of daily housework. Yet how long does it take to throw clothes or dishes into the washer, and remove them later? Vacuuming can be done in 1 hour a week. Grocery shopping is another hour per week. A decent meal can be prepared in under an hour. Does all of this add up to 7 hours a day? The lie that housework is hard, time-consuming drudgery is no longer as persuasive as it may have been in the past, because in an age of later marriage, many men are already experienced in cooking, cleaning, and general housekeeping and know that it doesn’t take that much effort or time. Humourously, not every stay-at-home-wife even performs all of these duties.

“I can’t find a job”
She has been out of work too long, and therefore is unable to find a job. This may be true, but many men do not consider this risk when they agree to support her while she “temporarily” stops working. Hopefully now they will, and can make a more informed decision. Many wives may use this as a convenient scapegoat to stop looking for any job at all. The next section describes how this can be used against him in the event of divorce.

“It doesn’t pay for me to work”
In the short run, the expenses of returning to work such as gas, lunch, clothes and day care may not make it worthwhile for her to return to the workforce. This may be true, but does that justify her playing tennis, drinking lattes and ‘catching up with her friends’ while her husband toils away? Many couples may be too shortsighted to thoroughly and comprehensively think through this issue. Initially, the cost to benefits ratio may not be ideal, but her returning to work will improve her job skills and network of contacts and over time the return on investment will improve. More so than strolling through the local mall every afternoon and window-shopping for new window treatments. Over time, as her career gets back on track, and she becomes qualified for better jobs, her salary should also improve.

It should be duly noted that some working wives view their salary as “personal spending money”, and still expect the man to pay all or most of the bills. Western Women are often heard to claim that, “What’s mine is mine, and what’s his is ours.”

Even more unfair double standards that favour wives

If a married man cheats, he’s the scum of the earth. He is a selfish jerk that has jeopardised the family unit, done his ‘thinking with his little head’, and disrespected his wife and children. However, when the woman cheats, she’s portrayed as the victim of an insensitive and inattentive husband. “Poor thing, he ignores her. It is for her empowerment, to boost her ego. She deserves it after bearing and rearing his children.” It’s good for her self-esteem. Worse, her cheating is portrayed as the man’s fault. If he works long hours to provide for her and the children, he works too much. If he is tired at the end of the day from 13 hours of manual labour, then he doesn’t compliment her as much as she wants. Into this vacuum of conflicting expectations steps the first man who “makes me feel like a Real Woman again…”. You read that correctly; the man who is scrambling to pay the mortgage and car payments and is working double shifts to pay for the consumer goods she demanded to have is now considered a negligent and emotionally abusive husband. The man who may be working two jobs to allow her to be home with her kids is now considered a candidate for Domestic Violence.

When a woman cheats, the first thing people ask is what he did, or more often, didn’t do, to drive her into the arms of another man.

When a man cheats, no one ever asks the same question.

When a woman cheats, the reaction will be; “Oh, poor thing, I guess her husband couldn’t get the job done in the bedroom”.

When a man cheats, no one ever stops to think; “Oh poor fellow, his wife was horrible in bed.”

Let’s not forget what happens if a man were to leave his wife for a younger woman. This will become fodder at the coffee shop for months. It is automatically assumed that he is a shallow sex maniac whose only motivation was to be with a younger woman. The possibility that his wife was of a generation of women who were taught to hate men and that younger women do not, that she was lazy, or a reckless spendthrift, or verbally or physically abusive, or grossly overweight, or an incompetent mother, are rarely considered and are often totally ignored. The myth is that the only reason a man leaves his wife is to be with a younger, more attractive woman. Never mind if she is a better match for him and a more supportive, nurturing mate.

If a man insists on a Pre-Nup, he is selfish and unromantic. However, when is the last time a woman who demanded a Pre-Nup was called “unromantic”? On the contrary, if a woman requests a Pre-Nup, she is being fiscally responsible, sensible and looking out for herself. (Note: If your fiancée refuses to sign a Pre-Nup, she has just shown her hand. Best to leave now.) Why is it that a woman can refuse a Pre-Nup, and it is accepted by society? In reality, the man should be outraged that she is after a legal contract, and not love.

What is astounding is the hypocrisy of the usual reaction towards Pre-Nups. Women can conveniently assert that a man is unromantic if he suggests a Pre-Nup. After all, how can a man pollute true love with the signing of legal paperwork! However, what is a marriage licence? Nothing more than a legal contract entered into between the man, woman and local and state government authorities. A woman does not seem to balk at signing this legal paperwork, which entitles her to at least half the assets a man has accumulated as well as half of everything he earns in the future, and obligates him to support her in perpetuity in the event of a breakup. Why aren’t men allowed to note how unromantic this contract is? The distraction of bridal magazines, place setting selection, floral arrangements, wedding dresses, receptions, wedding showers, and honeymoons have clouded the legal reality of what men are getting themselves into. Marriage is as much an unromantic legal contract as a prenuptial agreement is.

Initially, Pre-Nups were devised as a way to protect women. Nuptial agreements were popularised in the 19th century, mostly to protect heiresses from marrying men who were “out for their money”. Until the Married Women’s Property Act of 1848, under English Common Law, a woman’s property, upon marriage, was usually transferred to her husband.

“Stupid, Irresponsible” Men
Men are severely abused in our media, quite frankly. Just watch any TV commercial or sitcom and see how they portray men as idiots, dolts, or well intentioned, if bumbling, buffoons. If women were portrayed in commercials in the same fashion, “Women’s Organisations” would have a fit. If it weren’t for their wives in these shows and ads the men would be lost “animals”, unable to feed themselves or perform even the simplest of tasks. Other commercials make it appear that men act without thinking, only responding in an impulsive and irrational manner, and that the wife is the brains of the family. Even many women will agree that women often are the ones who act upon emotions and make judgments solely based up on emotional attachments and not logic or reason. Almost every “couples budgeting” article will portray the woman as the one who has to rein in the man’s childish spending, when in truth it is usually the woman who cannot control her expenditures.

Job Loss
If a husband loses his job and is having trouble finding work, the wife is completely and totally justified in threatening to leave him. However, can you imagine the reaction if a husband threatened to leave a wife who was in the exact same position? He would be vilified! If a man loses his job, the woman is justified in resenting the fact that the financial burden lies on her. He is no longer a ‘good provider’. When is a man allowed to resent this very same predicament? If a man is laid off and cares for the household and kids while the wife is working, he may be accused of not pulling his weight! Yet this is exactly the same situation that women demand more recognition for with each passing year! No matter what role the man plays, he loses!

Traditional Roles
It is perfectly acceptable for a woman to demand that a man make a certain salary, drive a certain car, live in a certain part of the city, have a certain job, have the ‘right’ manners, talk a certain way, walk a certain way, behave a certain way, have a degree from the ‘right’ University and dress in a stylish fashion, to be deemed “marriage material” and be able to provide her with the stability she feels she deserves. If a man demands his wife do the cooking and cleaning, he can now be labeled old fashioned and sexist. If he asks her to carry her weight financially, just as he does, he may be criticised as an inadequate provider. If a man insists that his wife honor the conjugal requirements of the marriage contract, he can and will be accused of sexual abuse, sexual assault or rape.

To add insult to injury, some women have gotten so pampered that they not only quit their jobs the day they find out they are pregnant, but they then go out and hire as many nannies, cooks, gardeners and pool boys as their husband can afford. Many Western Wives stay at home and hire someone else to rear the kids and clean up, while they drink lattes and go shopping all day with other pampered “stay-at-home” mothers. Does it pay to work hard and get ahead anymore, if this is how your hard-earned money is squandered?

The concept of the pampered wife is a relatively new one. Most of Western Civilisation was primarily an agricultural economy even up until the 1920’s and 1930’s. Western Wives contributed to the well being of the household by helping on the farm. A man needed a wife as an equal partner. It was not until the 1950’s that the first generation of Western Wives, first in The States and later in Europe, Australia and New Zealand, began to emerge as dead weight. Perhaps this coincides with the spiking of the divorce rate in The States, and later Europe and the other English Speaking Nations, and the rise of Feminism. Perhaps men have become tired of giving so much, while getting so little in exchange.


43% of Western Marriages end in divorce, and 70% to 93% of these divorces are initiated by women.

All men should consult a legal professional before marrying, and understand the implications of divorce, because the chances are 1-in-3 that they will participate in one whether they like it, want it, inititate it or not.

Upon divorce, all assets accumulated during and prior to a marriage are subject to division. It has become, simply put. a licence to steal. Even if the woman has not worked in years, and has spent the intervening decade(s) shopping and lunching from 8am-3pm, she is entitled to half, or more, of everything the man worked for during the course of the marriage. Is this fair? How many people would ever agree to a job contract that stipulated that in the event of separation that one party would have to return 50% of the gross amount of everything in the pay packet? No one in his or her right mind would knowingly sign such an agreement. Yet Western Men unknowingly agree to the exact same insanity each time they sign their marriage contract!

“Assets accumulated prior to a marriage are exempt from a divorce”. In theory this is true, in practice it is not. If funds from an account are commingled or combined, it can become marital property. How do funds become commingled, or mixed? If even the smallest sum from a prior account is spent towards the marriage, all of that account will now be considered marital property. Buy your child a lollipop from your own account, and a good lawyer will take one-half of it for your ex-wife when you divorce. If a woman moves into a home the man owned prior to the marriage, it is not safe from divorce. If she so much as hangs up a sheet of wallpaper, puts up draperies, paints a wall, or installs a light fixture, the home is now classified as joint marital property, and is now subject to equal division. Worse actually, the man can be ejected from the home if she makes a false claim of domestic violence, physical abuse, verbal abuse or child abuse. Where is the equality and fairness?

Note: “Equal Division” is also somewhat of a misnomer. Often, she can get upwards of 70% – 90% of the assets, while the man gets the majority of the debts! She gets all of the benefits, he gets all of the responsibilities. This, of course, is just and right and is his reward for working so hard all of those years. He can afford it; she can’t because she was not working.

If you pamper your wife, it can be used against you

Imagine that in the spirit of generosity and kindness that you gave a beggar a hot meal. A generous act, indeed. Now imagine your reaction if that same beggar sues you in court. He is petitioning the judge to have you keep providing him with the food that you gave him willingly, freely, out of a big heart. The judge orders you to keep feeding the homeless man meals, indefinitely, forever, because he has become accustomed to eating those meals! This is categorically absurd, yet this happens to Western Men in divorce court every day. Instead of thanking you for paying her bills for all those years, what you get is the privilege of being legally forced to pay her bills forever!

After having children, many women demand to quit working and stay home. Before the kids came along, many of these same women may have been in careers they hated, working long hours, and enduring long commutes. It is the man’s generosity and dedication to his own career that enables her to walk away from her own career. During a marriage, a man with a stay-at-home wife might work long and grueling hours in order to support her. He will pay the mortgage, the property tax, grocery bill, phone bill, cable bill, Internet bill and electric bill. He also pays for her car, gas money, clothes, and vacations.

As one final slap in the face, the man may be punished for working hard enough to allow his wife to have the luxury of staying at home with the kids. As noted above, after the children are in school, the wife may enjoy a life of leisure and relaxation that is afforded to her by her man’s hard work. In the event of divorce, he will be legally obligated to support her for years or decades to come. Because she stopped working and led a life of leisure, the ex-husband is now responsible for supporting her, forever! History has a tendency of rewriting itself. Originally, a woman may have had a career that she may have hated, and was begging to leave. Western Women often “play” at work and career for a few years after University, and then when they near 30 or grow tired of the workplace they seek out a man to “take her away from all of this”, whatever “all of this” may be. In fact her desire to leave the world of work may have been her motivation to have kids in the first place. But now, in her eyes, and definitely her lawyers eyes, she “gave up” her career for her man and his kids. She is now “owed” all of her “lost income”. His gift of leisure and support to her has now become twisted and is viewed as her sacrifice! Another way in which the situation is turned against him is that he will be characterised as being threatened by her having her own career, and that he forced her to quit her “lucrative career” and stay home with the children. Her lawyer will now attempt to convince the judge that he wanted to “oppress” his wife and “keep her down”. Truthfully now, how many men do you personally know that are upset at having a wife that earns a good living? Many of these misleading stereotypes still run rampant in our society, and are routinely used to the woman’s advantage during a divorce. As a result of her not working, regardless of whether she was minding the home or not, she remains a financial liability.

Generous, caring men who spoil their wives should certainly think twice about how this generosity can later be used against them. The phrase used in divorce court is “She has become accustomed to a certain lifestyle”. A husband’s reward for spoiling his wife today is the legal obligation to spoil her indefinitely, forever. Buy her a luxury car today, and you may be obligated to buy her luxury cars after she leaves you for another man! Yet, imagine a husband that became accustomed to eating a home cooked dinner, or regular conjugal visits. Now imagine the courts obligate the ex-wife to continue cooking for him and sharing her bed with him and his new girlfriend each night, despite being divorced! Inconceivable, but it happens the other way around every day!

The ultimate insult, however, comes when the man loses half or more of his life’s assets even when she has decided to leave him. Yes, a wife can unilaterally decide to kick a man out of his own home, and have the courts force him to continue paying the bills, while she is sleeping with her new boyfriend in the very house the husband worked so long and hard to buy! She can, and often does, spend her alimony check on gifts for her new boyfriend or lover! How is it that the legal system supports a woman who feels entitled to this?

The risks are clear, yet what exactly are men getting out of marriage? Many times, the reasons men get married are unfounded.

Many of the traditional reasons why a man gets married are a myth.

“I won’t die alone”
Wrong. The simple fact is that one spouse WILL die alone. Visit the hospital and go to the terminally ill or cardiac departments. Few people have the time to sit with an ill relative all day and all night. Yes, you may get visitors, but they aren’t having the same thoughts as you are. You’re contemplating your mortality, while they’re wondering what food the hospital cafeteria offers. In the end, even with a loving and supportive family, most of us will leave this world alone, unless you both die simultaneously in an accident of some kind. Your spouse may die fifteen years before you, or you may be in the hospital for your last year. Ultimately, we all die alone. Married or not.

“I won’t grow old alone”
Not necessarily. A marriage can self-destruct at any time. Your partner may initiate divorce at age 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 or 70. Many married people end up in the same position (alone) as if they had never married at all. Now they enter their twilight years broke, as a result of being stripped of half or more of their life’s assets, losing half their retirement and pension funds, and being assessed alimony payments. Experiencing financial devastation from one divorce often may preclude a man from ever marrying again. This is a common observation of many middle-aged Western Women. Q: “Where are all the men?”. A: “He is broke from the divorce settlement, alimony and child support payments.” Thus these women don’t find him marriable, and he grows old alone and poor.

Men are led to believe that not marrying implies only one destiny; that of a solitary monk in a cave, a shunned loner. However, life is not so black and white. Not marrying does not mean you cannot continue to date or have meaningful relationships throughout your life. There are plenty of single people in all age brackets. A bad marriage can be the loneliest of institutions, because most of your emotional outlet and companionship is concentrated into one person who gives back nothing in emotion, affection or support. Young men in their 20’s and 30’s should be more aware of the alternatives that exist in life. They should be aware that marriage is a choice, and is not the only path life has to offer. An informed decision is less likely to be one that is later regretted.

“I’ll get regular sex”
Not from Modern, Western Women. Access to regular sex is the oldest and the most frequently cited reason to marry. Many men now know that Modern, Western Women frequently stop having sex after just a short time of being married. There are plenty of “sexless” marriages. Talk to a few married couples that are honest about their relationship. One or both partners may stop wanting sex after kids, or the sex may be as infrequent as once a year or once every six months, or the wife may only have sex when she wants the husband to buy her something, take her somewhere, or remodel the house. Read the honest opinions of married men on the Internet. Most Western, Married Men will have more sex with their Western Wives in the first six months of their marriage than they will in the next 40 years. Lastly, it remains to be seen whether sex with one exclusive partner for forty years or more is even a natural act, or just a man-made convention. In many Western Nations, the wife is no longer required to have sex with her husband. She can deny him at any time, for any length of time. She can, if she wishes, deny him sex forever and there is nothing that he can do about it. In fact, if he insists that she honor her end of the marriage contract by being available for sexual relations, he can and will be accused of, charged with, and arrested for Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault or Rape.

Marriage is hardly a guarantee of regular sex, as many people are led to believe.

“I’ll have someone to cook and clean for me”
Not necessarily. While a Modern, Western Woman is perfectly justified in quitting her job in the name of staying home with the kids, she can also demand that the husband pay for a cook, a maid, and a nanny. This leaves the man to earn the money, and leaves him to pay for maintenance of household and children, while the wife gets to play at being a housekeeper. Today’s woman is empowered by not performing the traditional housewife duties, regardless of whether she is working or not. If a husband asks that his wife perform traditional household duties because she is not working, he will often be labeled sexist, abusive or controlling, even if he is doing his “traditional role” of paying all the bills, providing for his family, and performing the traditional manly duties of vehicle repairs, maintaining the lawn and house upkeep.

“I have to be married to have kids”
Not anymore. Her ovaries do not physically need a contract at the government center in order to be fertilised by your sperm. Cro-Magnon man had children long before lawyers invented marriage contracts. Often, you do not need to be married in order to share health benefits. You do not need to be married to designate your partner on a life insurance policy. You do not need to be married to own a dream home together. It is ironic that responsible parents who raise a healthy family, but never actually sign marriage paperwork, get less respect than divorced parents or married parents who are ineffective, inattentive or incompetent.

-Having a lifelong, faithful, committed relationship has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Owning a beautiful dream home together has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Rearing healthy, happy, and successful children has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Building a family and life together has nothing to do with being “married”.
-Growing old together has nothing to do with being “married”.

In fact, recent changes in cohabitation, partner and marriage law have proven that the only tangible consequence of marriage is having a formalised separation process that usually requires the talents of an attorney.

You do need to be married in order to throw an extravagant four-hour party, and share the same last name.

You do need to be married in order to involve the state and government in your romantic affairs.

You do need to be married in order give away half of everything you own.

Besides that, marriage does nothing more than introduce lawyers and social workers into your life. These are people that otherwise would have nothing to do with your life or your relationship.

Men need to stop and ask themselves:

“Why exactly am I getting married? What exactly does marriage mean to me in today’s world? What is the benefit to me to get married?”

It is no longer a lifelong commitment, because it can be reversed overnight on her unilateral whim.

Marriage was originally created as a way for families to merge land, property, political power and influence; perhaps people should return to viewing it as just that and nothing more. The rest of it is fake modern TV Fantasy and Tabloid Gossip and Hype polluting the minds of today’s impressionable youth, and a way to keep the multi-billion-per-year wedding industry chugging along. Perhaps the only criteria should be to ask oneself: “How excited am I for us to merge our finances and assets?” When all the fluff and hype are boiled away, that may be the only remaining reality. Spend a day in divorce court, and you’ll see exactly what is real and tangible and lasting about marriage. You’ll see women who signed the marriage contract under romantic pretenses who are now expert laymen attorneys who can cite case law. Bouquet throwing ex-brides now embroiled in warfare to get everything that is coming to them and more! The rest are myths, lies, bold unsubstantiated promises, and maybes. “For better or for worse…”

The Western Divorce rate is 43%. It is higher in some parts of the world such as California, Great Britain and Australia. In Japan the recent change in pension law may have many pensioners out on the street. In India new changes to dowry law have men being threatened by their wives. Consider the number of people who are in a bad marriage, but elect to stay; Men who don’t want to lose 50%, women who know they can’t support themselves alone. Next, think of how many more couples stay together just for the sake of the kids. Of these “forced marriages”, consider how many of these marriages involve infidelity, no sex, or sleeping in separate beds or separate rooms. I estimate the percentage of happy and monogamous marriages to be under 5%. Are these odds you would take in a business venture, investment or loan? Most of the risk-averse population would not. Yet they seek this exception to the rule everyday through marriage.

Written by dontmarry

November 21, 2008 at 4:44 pm

4,988 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Giselle Basanta
    Toronto, Canada
    #2 Jul 3, 2008
    I represent the Toronto District School Board and have been instructed to address the damage caused to the reputation of one of the Toronto District School Board’s principals, GORDY STEFULIC as a result of the erroneous information you have posted to this web site.
    I am duly notifying you that you have posted offensive, defamatory and harmful information to this web site.
    The Toronto District School Board has determined that this information is FALSE as attributed to GORDY STEFULIC.
    The Toronto District School Board is requesting that you delete this offending and inaccurate information immediately.
    It is imperative that you remove this information as the earliest opportunity as it has been reproduced and re-posted on other websites. The offending and inaccurate content is of the most serious concern to the Toronto District School Board and to Principal Stefulic and is negatively impacting on the school community and the Principal’s ability to carry out her statutory duties.
    Govern yourself accordingly.
    Giselle Basanta
    Associate Counsel
    Toronto District School Board

    tuna fish

    February 25, 2016 at 8:03 am

    • Assess the damages coming out of your ass. Nobody believes you and nobody is afraid. You are a racist, sexist psychopath who fantasizes about molesting children. We will keep posting and reposting your illegal activities and filth to whoever we please and justice will be served. WE WILL DELETE NOTHING! WE WILL POST EVEN MORE AND MORE FOREVER! If this site shuts down, we will post on other sites and create even more sites to post more. We will govern ourselves according to our wishes and preferences, not to your pathetic pleas. The TDSB knows that you are a fake and they tell others that you don’t represent them. They don’t want to be represented by you, loser. No one wants you and you have no power or control over anyone or anything.

      salmon fish

      February 25, 2016 at 11:23 am

    • Gordy Stefulic shouldn’t be vilified. A female teacher should be allowed to have sex with her students.


      March 8, 2016 at 11:32 am

      • A teacher who has sex with her students should be placed in jail for life.

        Anon is a Pervert

        March 8, 2016 at 1:12 pm

      • A female teacher IS NOT allowed to have sexual relations with her students you fucking pedophile. Gordy Stefulic needs to be stoned to death in the Middle East too if she is a child molestor

        Concerned Parent

        March 28, 2016 at 8:42 am

    • Fuck you and your so called Toronto District School Board


      April 16, 2016 at 8:42 pm

    • Go fuck yourself you money grabbing whore

      Joseph amos

      April 30, 2016 at 6:26 pm

  2. How can I receive permission to publish this article elsewhere?


    February 25, 2016 at 11:49 am

    • You got it. We should all know about pervs of TDSB.

      gigi Basanta

      April 2, 2016 at 8:24 am

  3. ***NEW THREAD***

    What are your thoughts on single dads?? Bringing to your attention first of all that it is 2016 not the 1950’s, fathers bringing up their children without their “female” partners is now extremely common in society. Therefore, if single mothers are “recycled” trash in addition to the other judgemental, ridiculous claims that have been made in this post, does the same rule then also apply to single dads? It is the complete ignorance of the minority that prevent society from progressing and contribute to stigma as is seen in this post here, you can not take one bad experience and then generalise it to the population, idiot.


    February 27, 2016 at 12:55 am

    • Well, moron, single fathers do better than single mothers.

      Single mothers earn significantly less than single fathers, and they’re penalized for each additional child they have even though the income of single fathers remains the same or increases with each added child in their family. Men also make more for every additional year they invest in education, further widening the gender gap, reports a University of Illinois study.

      “Single mothers earn about two-thirds of what single fathers earn. Even when we control for such variables as occupation, numbers of hours worked, education, and social capital, the income gap does not decrease by much. Single mothers are far more likely to live in poverty than single fathers, and they do not catch up over time,” said Karen Kramer, a U of I assistant professor of family studies.

      In 2012, 28 percent of all U.S. children lived with one parent. Of that number, 4.24 million single mothers lived below the poverty line compared to 404,000 single fathers, she noted.

      Several report that their ex-wives dominated domestic decisions and habits, and the men consciously or unconsciously acquiesced to her way of parenting while married. Now, left to their own devices, they’ve flourished in their new roles as independent parents. (Hear that ladies? Control freaks make men bad dads!)

      Thomas Coleman, executive director of the American Association for Single People, attributed the rise in single dads to a variety of reasons, including more judges awarding custody to fathers in divorce cases and more women choosing their jobs over family life.

      When fathers are involved in the lives of their children, especially their education, their children learn more, perform better in school, and exhibit healthier behavior. Even when fathers do not share a home with their children, their active involvement can have a lasting and positive impact.

      Preschoolers with actively involved fathers have stronger verbal skills.
      Radin, N., 1982, “Primary Caregiving and Role-Sharing Fathers,” in Non- Traditional Families: Parenting and Child Development, edited by M. Lamb, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 173–204.

      Children with actively involved fathers display less behavior problems in school.
      Amato, P.R., and Rivera, F., 1999, “Paternal Involvement and Children’s Behavior Problems,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 375–384.

      Girls with strong relationships with their fathers do better in mathematics.
      Radin, N., and Russell, G., 1983, “Increased Father Participation and Child Development Outcomes,” in Fatherhood and Family Policy, edited by M.E. Lamb and A. Sagi, Hillside, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 191–218.

      Boys with actively involved fathers tend to get better grades and perform better on achievement tests.
      Biller, H.B. 1993, Fathers and Families: Paternal Factors in Child Development, Westport, CT: Auburn House.

      Research shows that even very young children who have experienced high father involvement show an increase in curiosity and in problem solving capacity. Fathers’ involvement seems to encourage children’s exploration of the world around them and confidence in their ability to solve problems.
      Pruett, Kyle D. 2000. Fatherneed: Why Father Care is as Essential as Mother Care for Your Child. New York: Free Press.

      Highly involved fathers also contribute to increased mental dexterity in children, increased empathy, less stereotyped sex role beliefs and greater self-control.
      Abramovitch, H. 1997. Images of the “Father” in The Role of the Father in Child Development. M.E. Lamb, Ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.

      Sylvia & Kristen Forever

      February 27, 2016 at 6:37 am

  4. I have a question…Why are female teachers showing their nipples && engaging in sex with minor students? Isn’t that unethical? Female pedophiles need to be fed to the fishes.


    March 4, 2016 at 4:39 pm

    • Western women are a nightmare
      They have become self-centered and
      Crazy to be with
      This is why men have gone to foreign women!

      Don Dressel

      March 4, 2016 at 4:49 pm

    • Why do you hate women?

      A female teacher should be allowed to show her private parts to students. She should also be allowed to have sex with her students to prevent sexually frustrated students who might grow up to become Elliot Rodgers.


      March 8, 2016 at 11:31 am

      • Why do you hate male children? Perverts and misfits like you are responsible for raising kids who turn out like Elliot Rodgers.

        Anon is a Pervert

        March 8, 2016 at 1:11 pm

  5. Nudity around children is natural. When you spend a lot of time in clothing, a female teacher tends to sweat a lot inside the classroom. Sweat breeds bacteria, increasing your risk of bacterial infections. By spending more time naked inside the classroom, you allow your body to air out–thereby reducing your risk of infections forming.

    There’s something about being naked that forces you to face your flaws in the mirror and have your students respect you. Eventually, you’ll become more comfortable in your own skin, and things won’t look so bad. With time, your body image will change, and you’ll see yourself in a very different, more positive light. The male students will become less depressed and sexually frustrated because they are seeing a real woman’s vagina and not that of an adolescent girl who does not have anything. Female students should not be sexually active until they are over 21 years old.

    Vitamin D deficiency is currently soaring, with up to 75% of Canadian teens and adults receiving insufficient amounts of the “sunshine vitamin.” Lack of this essential health aid is a factor in numerous ailments, including cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis and diabetes. Anyone in the teaching profession who bares all outside as a “naturist” harvests larger amounts of Vitamin D in a quicker time span. Female teachers will become healthier if they are naked inside the classroom.

    I really believe that female nudity can have a very therapeutic effect on a student’s physical and mental health. There will be less Elliot Rodgers and sexually frustrated MRAs when more female teachers allow themselves to be present without clothing inside the classroom.


    March 6, 2016 at 8:59 pm

    • Nudity around children is not natural and you are a pedophile trying to justify your filthy perversions.

      Pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent children and act on their sexual fantasies. It is a startling fact that the etiology of this paraphilia is unknown. Pedophiles comes from all walks of life and have no common socio-economic background. Contrary to media-propagated myths, most of them had not been sexually abused in childhood and the vast majority of pedophiles are also drawn to adults of the opposite sex (are heterosexuals).

      Pedophiles seem to have narcissistic and antisocial (psychopathic) traits. They lack empathy for their victims and express no remorse for their actions. They are in denial and, being pathological confabulators, they rationalize their transgressions, claiming that the children were merely being educated for their own good and, anyhow, derived great pleasure from it.

      The pedophile’s ego-syntony rests on his alloplastic defenses. He generally tends to blame others (or the world or the “system”) for his misfortunes, failures, and deficiencies. Pedophiles frequently accuse their victims of acting promiscuously, of “coming on to them”, of actively tempting, provoking, and luring (or even trapping) them.

      The pedophile – similar to the autistic patient – misinterprets the child’s body language and inter-personal cues. His social communication skills are impaired and he fails to adjust information gained to the surrounding circumstances (for instance, to the kid’s age and maturity).

      We are not buying your perverted, narcissistic bullshit. STAY AWAY FROM THE KIDS PERVERT!

      Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert!

      March 7, 2016 at 4:02 am

      • Why do you hate women? A female teacher should be allowed to be nude inside the classroom and she should be allowed to have sex with her students.


        March 8, 2016 at 11:29 am

        • Why do you hate children, especially male children? Is it penis envy? Is it the rejection by all of the men who saw how sick you are?

          Anon is a Pervert

          March 8, 2016 at 1:10 pm

  6. Within Swedish families and Toronto classrooms, nudity around children is also commonplace, while many other nations such as Islam feel that allowing your kids to see you starkers is tantamount to sexual molestation.

    As usual, the changing rooms were full of nude female teachers and toddlers of both sexes. Nudity is not sexual.

    It’s her body, and it should be a female teacher’s choice if she desires to have sex with her students. The age of consent laws should not apply to female teachers because the female teacher is doing society a favour when she allows her male students to partake in sexual activities with her. There will be less Elliot Rodgers, Soudinis and Lepines if female teachers are allowed to have sex with her students.

    A woman’s breasts are neither sexual and children enjoy seeing a woman’s breasts like this video proves

    The well-being and integrity of kids are at a female teacher’s hands. Who are you to judge if a female teacher allows her male students to perform oral sex on her inside class? A female teacher is more powerful than God and all of the Christian, Moslem and Jewish Prophets combined altogether.

    The world will become a better place if we remove the stigma of female teachers who allow their male students to have sex with her body.


    March 8, 2016 at 11:27 am

    • Shut the fuck up, pervert! A female teacher is not God. You are a sick, arrogant pedophile and you deserve to be judged and imprisoned for your sick crimes after a fair trial.

      Anon is a Pervert

      March 8, 2016 at 1:09 pm

      • It’s 2016. The body-shaming and slut-shaming — it’s like, enough is enough. I will not live my life dictated by the issues you have with my sexuality. You be you and let me be me. I am a teacher. I am a wife, a sister, a daughter, a proud feminist and I am allowed to be sexy in the classroom.
        You will not stop me from preventing boys turn into mass shooters. My body saves lives and prevents school shootings. I am not degrading myself when I allow my male students to have sex with me. You have no business to tell me how I should teach my classroom. The Toronto District School Board is OK with nudity in the classroom. The sex between me and my students are consensual. There is nothing to be ashamed about when I teach nude inside the classroom. You are a Moselem and you want to oppress us. My students respect me because I allow them to experiment their sexuality on me. I am doing the students a favour. You are a terrorist and deserve to be deported from Canada.
        The male students do not press any charges against me and the age of consent is only for girls. Girls should not be having any relationships with boys until they are 30 years old.

        Madgelyn Thompson

        March 18, 2016 at 11:20 pm

        • It’s 2016. Protecting children from deviant female sexual predators will not be deemed body-shaming and slut-shaming. If you are a teacher, I will report you to the proper authorities. I don’t want you near my children. People like you turn boys into mass shooters. Perverts like you who hate boys and want toharm them. You talk like a child molestor. It’s all about you. Your body is nothing. You have no shame because you are a sick pervert and the Toronto District School Board is not okay with you. You are a perverted terrorist intent on destroying the lives of a children. The male students don’t have to press charges against you – the government will. That’s a promise.

          Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert! Go to Jail!

          March 19, 2016 at 2:42 am

        • When they catch up with you, you will rot in prison for the rest of your life.


          March 21, 2016 at 5:33 pm

    • What the fuck is wrong with you?!?!?!? You’re a disgusting, degenerate, perverted, genetically defective, subhuman pedophile POS scumbag!!! I can’t wait until you end up in prison. Who are you to judge if an inmate forces you toss his salad or take it up the ass inside a prison cell? It’s his body, and it should be an inmate’s choice if he desires to force punk pedophiles like you to have sex. Consent laws should not apply to degenerate punk pedophile inmates, because the other inmates are doing society a favor when they force punk pedophile inmates to partake in sexual activities with them. And if they decide to shank you after brutally ass raping you, who are you to judge what an inmate can do with his own shank?


      March 29, 2016 at 12:42 pm

  7. I never understand why people get so bothered by what other people choose to do with their lives. I allow my male students to penetrate me because I am preventing future Elliot Rogers. I sometimes have to do oral on my 10 y.o. students because the female students are disciplined enough to not have any sexual feelings for boys until they are over 30.
    My anus is a favourite by the male students. They love to do anal on me. I am working for the interests of the students.You cannot stop me. Nudity is not illegal in Canada. I will continue to have sexual intercourse with the male students as I please.

    Madgelyn Thompson

    March 18, 2016 at 11:25 pm

    • Pervert. I will file charges with the police. I have taken snapshots of this website and I will file a report with the police. They will track you down. You think you are getting away with it because nothing has been done until now but that allows you to hang yourself with your own rope. You are taking the bait. You think you are untouchable but you will shortly find out that you are mistaken. We will stop you. You will see. Smug pervert, you will be stopped. You have now sealed your faith, you arrogant child molestor.

      Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert! Go to Jail!

      March 19, 2016 at 2:45 am


      Responding to a Female Pedophile

      March 21, 2016 at 1:23 pm

      • A rafter and a rope is the only fix for you. If you truely believe that giving oral to a 10 year old is ok, i WISH NOTHING BUT PAIN AND AGONY FOR YOU FOR THE REST OF YOUR SORRY LIFE


        March 21, 2016 at 3:33 pm

  8. The female teacher from Toronto is a bloody child molestor….One of these days someone’s parent is going to barge into her classroom, take her outside and rightfully blow out her fucking child molesting brains for all of those sick acts she did on her students…She is very arrogant and believes that she is not wrong because she is a teacher and from a feminized city like Toronto…..I hope the media doesn’t demonize the parents who rightfully puts a Colt into her sick head because she is molesting children and justifying it as nude pride.

    Female Pedo Teacher need Euthanized

    March 21, 2016 at 8:55 pm

    • Nudity is not sexual. Female teachers are not breaking the law because nudity is not illegal


      March 26, 2016 at 11:15 am

      • Nudity in front of under-aged children is illegal, pervert.

        Police Alert

        March 26, 2016 at 11:46 am

        • Moslems are rapists. Female teachers should be naked around little boys because the boys will learn sex from an independent woman. Boys who receive sex from their teachers are given the best reward in life, you rapist! You raped me

          Ariel Troster

          April 4, 2016 at 4:53 am


            Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert!

            April 4, 2016 at 11:04 am

  9. Relax. The male students are having fun when their female teacher is unclothed.


    March 26, 2016 at 11:13 am

    • How old is that male and how old is the female? I demand an answer.

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:39 am

      • Sick, disgusting and tragic. You will be caught. Do you think you won’t be caught?

        Police Alert

        March 26, 2016 at 11:45 am

    • Fucking terrible that she fucks those students and produces photographs on her depraved acts….That teacher needs to be put on an electric chair or shot by a military firing squad.

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:27 am

      • Did you stop taking your meds?

        The male students do not look unhappy in the picture. Women cannot rape dumbo

        You rapist. You raped me!

        Ariel Troster

        April 4, 2016 at 4:51 am


          Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert!

          April 4, 2016 at 11:12 am

  10. A woman should be celebrated for posing naked around young boys. We will teach men that we don;t need them because we have little boys to pleasure


    March 26, 2016 at 11:19 am

    • From where do you get these pictures? Child pornography is illegal.

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:45 am

    • Fuck this shit! When a man catcalls a woman on the street it’s a criminal offense, but this perverted cunt storms into a child’s room without her shirt on and these fucking Canadian feminists are promoting it as tolerant? Where is WW3 when you need it? All the feminists from Canada should stay in a remote area and wait for a meteorite or missle from North Korea to land on them!

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:30 am



    March 26, 2016 at 11:23 am

    • We will stop you and your ass will be kicked around in prison, child molestor.

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:44 am



    March 26, 2016 at 11:27 am


      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:43 am

    • Canadian feminists don’t give eye contact to men but they would rather be nude around these toddlers and have those toddlers kissing them up in sexual poses? Where is the electric chair when you need it? These Canadian feminists are some sadistic fucking child molestors! They need to be executed before they harm more toddlers

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:32 am




    March 26, 2016 at 11:32 am

    • More police reports. You won’t get away with this, I swear.

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:40 am

    • Holy shit! Ms. Seymour needs to be electrocuted on an electric chair and you and your Canadian feminists need to be wiped out by North Korea. The pedophilia and child molestation have to stop You are fucking sadistic to believe that these young children are consenting to sexual acts with their mothers and female teachers. You need to be executed by Obama bitch

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:37 am



    March 26, 2016 at 11:38 am

    • This is what you keep on your computer, child molestor?

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:42 am

    • Stefanie Seymore is a child molestor and pedophile who deserves to be stoned to death

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:40 am



    March 26, 2016 at 11:40 am

    • The law will stop you, pervert.

      Police Alert

      March 26, 2016 at 11:41 am

    • WHAT THE FUCK HERE? The woman in the picture needs to have her head chopped off with Obama’s guillotine or be stoned to death by the CIA-Backed Rebels in the Middle East. She is a fucking pedophile. She needs to be stopped.

      Concerned Parent

      March 28, 2016 at 8:34 am

      • You raped me.

        Why are you uttering threats on the woman? Her son should not have touched her like that. He is the pervert and you raped me!

        Ariel Troster

        April 4, 2016 at 4:48 am

        • You raped male children. Why are you posting filthy, perverted pictures of naked women near male children. You are a rapist. You are a child molestor and rapist and your pathetic victimization ploy won’t work. YOU WILL BE ARRESTED!

          Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert!

          April 4, 2016 at 11:00 am

  16. The female pedophile in this thread and those in the photographs need to be given a lethal injection or an electric chair. If stoning was legally sanctioned, then that will be preferable to deal with these feminazi teachers and female pedophiles from Canuckland!

    Concerned Parent

    March 28, 2016 at 8:39 am

  17. Dr. Bassman said lust is often the motive for males while affection and the need for power are the reasoning for women.

    “It’s difficult to generalize, but a number of females are typically in a marital relationship and they see their acting out as being an affair,” said Dr. Bassman. “They don’t really see it for what it is– abuse.”

    It’s abuse that attorney Joshua Crabtree said is often made possible by blurred boundaries that have been erased by new technology. The former teacher has represented victims in some of the area’s biggest teacher-student sex scandals.

    “Teachers inviting students into their lives and all the things that social media allows,” said Crabtree. “It reduces barriers.”

    Fox19 Legal Analyst and former Hamilton County Prosecutor Mike Allen added that society’s double standard also makes it tougher to prosecute offenders.

    “If the male teacher is the defendant and there’s a female student, that person is probably going to prison,” said Allen. “If on the other hand, it’s a female teacher and a male student, you’re not seeing that many stiff sentences.”

    Consider some of the national high profile cases.

    Remember Mary Kay Letourneu? The middle school teacher had sex with her 13 year old student. She served seven years in prison, but once released, the two were married and are still together.

    Former model and beauty pageant contestant Pamela Rogers was charged with 15 counts of sexual battery after an affair with a 13 year old student. She was first sentenced to 270 days in prison, but violated probation by sexting the same victim. She was then sentenced to eight years behind bars.

    Florida teacher Deborah Lafave had sex with a 14-year-old male student. She spent no time behind bars. She said she had bipolar disorder.

    Tom W

    March 30, 2016 at 11:47 pm

  18. Why in the world are there so many Low Life Garbage Loser women in this world now? God please stop this already.


    April 2, 2016 at 8:14 am

    • There were always Los Life Garbage Loser women in the world. Feminism makes it seem as if only men are losers and women are all winners but who do you think raised the losers? Loser women.

      The Truth Hurts and Feminists Can't Stand It

      April 2, 2016 at 10:36 am

      • You raped me. You’re a rapist!

        Ariel Troster

        April 4, 2016 at 4:46 am

        • You rape children. You are a child rapist! You are a child molestor! Fuck you, pervert!

          Shut the Fuck Up, Pervert!

          April 4, 2016 at 11:01 am

  19. Missus Teacher wants to fuck the 4th grade students by revealing her titties in class. She is such a fucking perv that she needs to be shot

    Teacher Unions

    April 15, 2016 at 4:25 pm

  20. Female teachers in Arkansas don’t want to wear panties and bras in the classroom? What the fucking hell?!

    Teachers balk at dress code requiring underwear, bras; flip-flops and spandex are out: Fair?

    Are female teachers so fucked up that they come to class naked? Shit. They need to be burned alive for their pedophile fantasies on those innocent students.

    Teacher Unions

    April 15, 2016 at 4:34 pm

  21. Look here! The Lurker might be that child killer Karla Homolka!

    Everyone grab your guns and make sure she doesn’t go near your children? She murdered several underaged girls, and she might have been posting the numerous pedophile comments on this blog from the safety of her home in Canada. She needs to be stopped before she rapes or murders another harmless human being!

    Lurker might be Karla Homolka

    April 20, 2016 at 9:21 pm

  22. Many Many thanks Dear to say clearly the truth. May God help all men and protect us from those money idolaters and vampires.

    Ali Gdansk Smile

    April 27, 2016 at 6:04 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 206 other followers