Are Women Necessary?
Are Women Necessary?
Post by Dr Mystery on Jan 19, 2006, 9:03pm
Recently, I had the pleasure of hearing a Kelly Clarkson song titled ‘Walk Away’ – in which see sings ‘I want a man by my side, not a boy who runs and hides. Are you gonna fight for me, die for me, live and breathe for me….”
The bold section is what got me thinking… why? Why should he die for you, and live and breathe for you?
I believe the greater majority of western women have embodied this same holier-than-thou attitude expression in Kelly Clarksons lyrics.
What I can’t seem to put my finger on is this: What do women do for men, these days, that’s so great, so wonderful, a man should live and breathe for her and die for her? If a man put out an album stating he wanted his woman to die for him, live and breathe for him, most women would scoff, guffaw, laugh, and everything else under the sun, because well, men aren’t worthy of such devotion.
Maureen Dowd. just put out a book titled ‘Are Men Necessary‘, proclaiming men these days are redundant and of no use. Maureen aside, there has been tons of female-written literature these days stating how useless and outdated the male creature has become to women, and to life.
And just like the ‘can’t form my own opinion’ collective sheep they are, mass amounts of women smirk, take these messages to heart, and beat their chests to the daily tunes of male bashing.
But I wonder if any of those women, you women, have stopped and actually asked the question, just what DO women do for men these days? What do men rely on women for, these days?
Who’s really the redundant ones here? What have you ever done for you man in a relationship, besides f**k him?
Even with closed eyes, you can see its men who hold up the greater/full burden of relationships, while women usually just enjoy the free ride, doing nothing, as if she is a child being taken care of by an adult. In relationship’s these days, women do nothing, while men do everything. Men pay for everything, while women pay for nothing.
And no, buying him a pair of socks every now and then does not count. Of course, a lot of girls will read this post and cry bulls**t, then tomorrow go to their girlfriends proclaiming, ‘What’s mine is mine, and what’s his is mine’.
Relationships and marriage have devolve into a one way street for men, in which he gives everything, but all she gives in return is a flat piece of pussy… which can really be taken care of by his left hand, and cheap ‘emotional support’ every now and then, which really boils down to her bulls**ting long enough to keep her slave in line.
Everything, and I mean everything women use to do for men are being done by men themselves. Chores once considered womanly, are being done by single men living alone. Men cook for themselves, clean for themselves, and take care of themselves, all without the aid of a woman. There’s so many single men living alone, and living happy, yet feminist journalists can not stand this. Pick up a newspaper, you will read how women who live alone are liberated and happy, then these same journalists will say men who live alone are sad and lonely – as if trying to guide the minds of men in to thinking they actually ‘need’ a woman.
Women are not necessary, Men do not need women. – This is a line that is so gut wrenching and terrifying to most women, and they do not want to really think about it. But then go chanting the mantra over and over again that Women do not need men.
Even out of relationships, men are the beasts of burden who do the ‘heavy lifting’ needed to keep the world spinning. All the dangerous or disgusting jobs you never hear about – the jobs that women steer clear of are usually 100% entirely composed of men.
Can anybody tell me what women contribute to this world, besides their ability to birth, that keeps the earth spinning?
Women really don’t do anything when you think about it, do they? Women have long cried out how they want to be worth more than their vag**a… but it seems the opposite has happened. Overall, women do nothing for men on the large scale basis – women are entirely consumers in the world, while men are the producers. Women do none of the dirty, dangerous jobs needed to keep our cities healthy and sanitary. Women do none of the ‘heroing’ and chivalrous jobs needed in times of emergency. Think hurricane Katrina… all the people doing the rescuing were men. I’m sure there was like one woman here or there, but any shots in news, magazines (women’s magazines) you will see an entire cast of male rescue workers.
Women do nothing for the world.
In relationships, women do nothing for men at all but fu*k, and consume what he produces.
It seems, sadly, that women have somehow become worthy of nothing more than their vag**a’s.
In another man-hating attack (written in a mainstream newspaper as always) HERE:
The feminist says:
Quote:
Rather than feel useless and rejected, most men should perhaps feel lucky that women still show as much interest in them as they do and want their companionship.
What she should have said was: For all their self-absorbed ways and utter uselessness in all aspects of life, women should consider themselves lucky that men still want their companionship
Here and there, every now and then, you will hear a girl say, or post in this thread, they actually do a lot for their boyfriend. But those girls are very few and very far between. And even most of the girls who actually claim they do ‘stuff’ for their men will draw a blank stare when you actually ask them WHAT they do for their boyfriends. Ask the average guy the same question, what he does for his girlfriend, I bet you right off the bat he could point out more than just a few things.
Now besides for all the knee-jerk reactions to this post will receive, I’d love a well thought out, detailed response, from a girl, explaining just what women actually do FOR men in relationships these days besides sex.
But I doubt I’ll get that, since women don’t do sh*t for men in relationships.
Are Men Necessary, the title of that book should have been: Are Women Necessary.
Die for you? Live and breathe for you? Like… why? I think I’ll just take the pussy.
That’s all you seem to be worth these days.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by niceguy78 on Jan 19, 2006, 9:09pm
What a great read, thank you for sharing.
It should be added to the main web page, so everyone can enjoy.
How very true.
I am 27, and I feel complete in life, simply because I am single. I don’t have a weaker sex human, dragging my life into the shitter, with their inferior brain and emotional actions.
The western women offer one thing, they are not even good at it, and expect a high reward for it. Fuck it, I can go to Amsterdam, get 10 times better for 1/1000 the price.
NEXT.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by batshit bitch on Jan 19, 2006, 9:32pm
The only thing that women were ever “necessary” for, was childbirth. When this can be done artificially, women might be in for a rude awakening. There’s a reason we call our species mankind, not womankind. All progression and sustenance depends on men, as it always has.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by anonymous on Jan 19, 2006, 10:24pm
Both men and women are necessary whether people want to admit it or not. If men got bored and tired of women enough and vice versa, the human species would of gone extinct a long time ago. Due to the artificial environmental injections of feminism as well as general western decadence, even though men and women for the most part are pre-programmed to want to be together, there is so much discord in modern society that it is actually doing a good job at screwing up the only thing really important that human beings and all other sexually reproducing organisms on this planet are supposed to do and that is breed.
And even if men could have babies on their own and vice versa (well sadly women can in this society but the “fatherless home” social experiment seems to not be working out so well even though liberals are in denial about the social problems it causes even though statistics show objectively otherwise), it still would not be a good idea because of “comparative advantage”.
Most small businesses start off with the owner doing a lot of the grunt work, but as time goes on and his time is far more valuable managing and growing the business so it only makes sense to hire and train grunts to do the menial work he used to do so that he can concentrate on the parts of the business that can’t be replaced (since he is the one guiding the business).
The same principle applies in families. Just because men and women can cook and just because both of them can go out and have “careers” does not mean that it makes sense for both of them to be doing the exact same stuff and trying to divide up the tasks. That is like the small business guy hiring someone to be a part time CEO while he shares the grunt work which is a waste of his time since it is more valuable for the owner to do the CEO job than the other way around.
Men and women and children in family units who work together as a team where everyone has their own unique roles, rather than as competitors with each other trying to outdo each other in every possible job, are arguably the most efficient economic unit in the world as evolution has made human beings this way over many millions of years of our hominid progression. Unfortunately, scientific fact is antithetical to ideas like feminism and socialism which focus more on some idealists way of how “things should be” rather than “the way people actually are”.
That is why I fear Osama Bin Laden and other radical Islamists will have the last laugh because in the long run their family units will be more productive than western family units which at the moment are totally dysfunctional and on life support.
Trying to get the hundreds of millions of women in the western world who are infected with feminism to realize that just because wonder woman is cool, superman still could kick her ass any day and therefore her role would be better suited pumping out superbabies and taking care of superman after a hard days work saving the world from the evil forces out there hellbent on enslaving it.
Unfortunately, while we are at war with an enemy whose motto is Sharia or death, feminists instead see it as an opportunity to push more anti-male legislation under the radar while the public’s attention (i.e. the attention of most men) are on more important matters like they should be.
Maybe companies have the right idea with all the outsourcing going on. I say, why don’t we just outsource all our bitchy, useless, feminist women to the middle east and see how they like it over there.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by travis on Jan 19, 2006, 10:40pm
Quote:Maybe companies have the right idea with all the outsourcing going on. I say, why don’t we just outsource all our bitchy, useless, feminist women to the middle east and see how they like it over there.
I say all women who say they hate men or they don’t need men should be sent to Africa with only the clothes on their backs. I don’t care what they look like, send ‘em. They should be able to survive with grrl power anyway.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by Kuai on Jan 20, 2006, 2:00am
Women are needed, I agree with ‘anonymous’ in the fact that had cavemen thought like ‘Dr Mystery’ does, the human race might not have survived.
Just because western women are brainwashed with feminist ideology does NOT mean all women should be maligned and hated. That is pure mysogenistic hate and shouldn’t be tolerated.
In fact if anything, WE ALL start off being female, in the womb the standard sex is female, the embryo is pumped with hormones which change its sex to male, study of embryonic development will tell you that in an embryo the clitoris becomes the penis, the pussy lips become the scrotum, the ovaries become testes, etc.
Males are evil too, or is that this label only applies to females?
——————————————————————————–
Re: Are Women Necessary?
Post by anonymous on Jan 20, 2006, 3:00am
Jan 20, 2006, 2:00am, Kuai wrote:Women are needed, I agree with ‘anonymous’ in the fact that had cavemen thought like ‘Dr Mystery’ does, the human race might not have survived.
Just because western women are brainwashed with feminist ideology does NOT mean all women should be maligned and hated. That is pure mysogenistic hate and shouldn’t be tolerated.
In fact if anything, WE ALL start off being female, in the womb the standard sex is female, the embryo is pumped with hormones which change its sex to male, study of embryonic development will tell you that in an embryo the clitoris becomes the penis, the pussy lips become the scrotum, the ovaries become testes, etc.
Males are evil too, or is that this label only applies to females?
Well, that “we all start off female” is actually some misinformation spread by feminists who think they know science. We actually all start off as a gender neutral human being, and the specialization of our sex branches off at a certain period of development in utero (not sure off the top of my head at what point in gestation that happens to be).
We don’t start off with vaginas and fallopian tubes and ovaries and then those sexual organs magically morph into a penis and testies. It just doesn’t work that way. The same goes with brain development in utero as well.
——————————————————————————–
