Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by specialopsdude on Feb 12, 2006, 1:49am
Before I get started, I’m glad to be back using the INTERNET again; just finished Airborne School at Fort Benning and I’m now on my second tour in the middle east.
I’m in the Army, an organization that has gone through many painful changes over the last half century, as more and more women have joined to serve. It causes so many f*ucking problems, I could write a series of books about the decay of the fighting man’s morale when a women gets into the ranks. But I’ll focus on the extreme AW, the Deployment Princess.
Any of you who are military or ex-military know what I’m talking about. Women don’t make up that big of the US Army – and this isn’t usually a problem (dating wise), because soldiers like me can head off base and mingle with the civilian chicks (if you are lucky enough to be overseas you have decent access to FW, if you go far enough from the base).
But then you get deployed : 6 to 12 months + of being somewhere not very pleasant. This usually sucks enough, but the comrades and friendships made can really help. In 2006, however, you see many more women down range in hot spots. This has the effect of cranking up the drama 10-fold.
I’m not currently in a “war-zone”, but I’m really close to one. We have R&R facilities, and the ratio on my base is easily 15-1 or more Male to female. The current place I’m in does have civilian contractors, some women, but they are not allowed to mingle with the soldiers. So, you have a handful of women surrounded by men for long periods of time – and most all of these men are 18-30 year old soldiers on a pass from Iraq or Afghanistan blowing off steam and relaxing before going back to the shit.
Its unbelievable! You think AW have a stick up their ass stateside – wait until you see a fugly deployment princess surrounded by horny GI’s just trying to get laid. After you been in the desert with nothing but sand, camels and crazy f*cks trying to blow you up, an ugly chick starts to look good.
So you got some real skanks who become super-models and they just soak it all up. I’ve heard stories (and talked to buddies who’ve done this) of groups of soldiers getting it on with a female for money. Some forward deployed women make a boat-load of cash from sexual favors. They busted two women in Afghanistan for trying to bring back a suitcase filled with money – guess how they made it?
There are women here, who I wouldn’t give the time of day back in the states, who can have just about any of a number of men a night. Many of these “Princesses” are married, and just can’t wait to bang tons of men while deployed. I’m not excusing the married men who do that – but at 15-1 ratio, there are just a far more number of guys here.
I’m glad that I have my shit together and my deployments of late don’t last beyond 6 months. I wish things were like they used to be, no women near the front lines – and the brass understood that men are men, and we need access to local “working women” who won’t demand to be treated like a queen. Thats the real problem, the women on post have no local competition.
If these guys, who put their lives on the line, could get some free and easy companionship, instead of having to fight for scraps and do some ungly skank in a porta-potty, the morale would be allot higher over here.
But the Department of Defense has instituted such PC nanny-policies of sexual harassment and all, that the idea of allowing hookers on deployed posts, or near it, would create a storm of shrieking feminists and media, even though it’d make serving your country far from home just a little more bearable.
Just my 2 cents.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by niceguy78 on Feb 12, 2006, 3:49am
Jesus man, thank you for sharing.
1st and foremost, thank you for serving our country. I do honestly believe we are in a war we will eventually in time lose (the muslim community is just too strong for the Western pussified world to ever beat), but you are serving us proud, and helping to protect all of us here in the states.
2nd, I read that they were going to not allow US soldiers to look at porn on the internet. When I hear that I was so pissed off. They are risking their goddamn lives to defend us, and they can’t even enjoy some pictures of women on the net. WTF!!!
3rd I wish the US military would at least put their foot down and say “NO” to women being involved, but obviously they cannot/have not. Now we get to watch women water down our military, and fuck things up even more. Flat amazing.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 7:18am
I’m also in the military and currently overseas. I’m not in a war zone but it isn’t somewhere very desireable either.
I agree 100% with everything you said. American women act much worse while overseas than back in the states. Every woman over here has a dozen guys trying to fuck them. Many of these women are very unatractive but the guys are so desparate for sex that they have no standards. It really gives the women big egos. A buddy of mine turned down a chick for sex. She was really attractive but has had more dick than a urinal at a truck stop. She called him up later and totally cussed him out. She just couldn’t handle the fact that she got turned down. Another time, the same guy met an attractive lady at a club off base. They went back to her dorm room and they were messing around and getting undressed. He saw a picture of some kids and asked who they were. She said those are my kids. He then asked who the guy was in the picture with the kids. She replied “oh that is my husband.” He asked her why she is fucking around on her husband and she tried to justify it by saying that she gets lonely. He left immediately. After seeing the way women act over here my buddy and I both agree that if we were married to a woman in the military and she got orders to come here, we would divorce her immediately. Of course both of us never plan on getting married again. We both made that mistake when we were younger and it will never happen again.
The military pretty much fuels the problem. Getting busted seeing a prostitute would pretty much end your career. At the very least you would lose rank. There are plenty available off base but nobody I know would dare to take a chance at visiting one. Thanks to the wonderful Armed Forces Network (AFN) commercials we are reminded several times a day that prostitution is illegal and how it isn’t a victimless crime. Fucking please. So men either have a choice to risk seeing a prostitute, jerking off, or chasing one of the bitches on base. The military has become so politically correct that it makes me sick.
At work both in the states and overseas, women in the military are pretty much worthless. There are a few exceptions but 9 out of every 10 aren’t worth a damn. They need constant help doing their jobs and they need constant supervision to make sure they are doing their jobs instead of talking on the phone with one of the 1000 guys that are trying to fuck them. I work with one female who is a real gem. She totally sucks at our job. She is always the last one to get to work and the first one out the door when it is time to leave. But she tries to act like Miss Military and if anyone lower ranking than her so much as looks at her wrong, she gets onto them. She is the queen of political correctness and if anyone cusses she counsels them and writes them up. I’ve complained about her and our wonderful politically correct leadership takes her side. I have considerably more rank than her and she knows better than to mess with me. However, she takes notes about every little thing that goes on in our section. She has a performance review coming up and she has already been told by her supervisor that it isn’t going to be a good one. I think she is going to try to claim she works in a hostile environment because we cuss around her. I’m sorry but this is the military and if you can’t handle being around people who use profanity then you need to find a new line of work.
When I got to my last base I worked with a female that used to bring in a suit case full of Mary Kay crap and spent half of her day walking around to different offices and selling the stuff to other women. I guess this had been going on for months and nobody would say anything to her about it. I finally told her to never bring that stuff into work again. She bitched and complained but she never did.
This chick I supervised at my last base came up to me one day and said “if somebody has a phobia and can’t wear a gas mask, would they kick them out of the military?” I told her yes and she started sobbing and walked away. I don’t know how she made it 2 years in the military with being afraid to wear a gas mask. We ended up having to send her to counselling to get help with the problem. My opinion was just to kick her ass out.
After nearly 13 years in the military I have tons of stories about how wonderful it is to work with women. It makes me pissed just thinking about it.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 7:23am
niceguy78:
2nd, I read that they were going to not allow US soldiers to look at porn on the internet. When I hear that I was so pissed off. They are risking their goddamn lives to defend us, and they can’t even enjoy some pictures of women on the net. WTF!!!
Actually that isn’t totally accurate. We can’t look at pornography from a government computer. However, from your home computer you can do whatever you want. The only exception to that would be if pornography was illegal where you are stationed.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by khankrumthebulgar on Feb 12, 2006, 9:29am
Last year I worked with a Former Army Captain who was stationed at Grafenvir in Germany during the Cold War. One day while on his rounds he saw a bunch of GIs standing in line outside of a tent. They were taking turns banging a Female US GI who was running a “Cash Consession” if you get my drift. The suitcase full of cash comes as no suprise to me. That our PC Nanny Government and Feminized Dumb Asses know as much about Fighting Men as they do about Fucking. And their children are absent from the conflict as usual. I have extreme views about Feminists. I have two Sisters who I have threatened to shoot. They joined Code Pink while their Nephew a Marine was fighting Al-Queda in Fallujah. I went Postal on their asses.
Some of our Women do their jobs and their female counterparts compromise their integrity with their outrageous behavior. In the Military it is about the Mission.
AW are about themselves and screw everybody else. Colonel David H. Hackworth (deceased) wrote you would find it easier to know from the DOD where the Stealth Bombers were at than how many AW GIs were getting Pregnant in Theatre. He and I used to send each other emails while he was alive. He never told me he had Cancer and was gravely ill. I miss him alot. One brave Son of A Bitch that guy was. He cared a hell of alot about the Boots on the Ground.
To you Men who defend us my deepest thanks. You make great sacrifices to defend our Republic. You deserve better than we are giving you.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by a sailor on Feb 12, 2006, 10:07am
You should see the Navy! There are a series of COs who have been relieved of their command because they let the whore houses run on board ship. There are a number of female “sailors” who make a nice living at sea. You should hear the stories!
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by phil on Feb 12, 2006, 10:32am
Thanks for serving our country. It must be terribly difficult and disheartening fighting to protect/preserve the freedom of worthless piece of shit trash American Women. Fuck AW! Fight for men; we will beat this cancer known as AW.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by toadman on Feb 12, 2006, 10:49am
Quote:Thats the real problem, the women on post have no local competition.
This is partly due to the current environments where deployed. The Middle East is no comparison to Asia or Europe where you CAN meet women off-post.
FYI my son is serving with the 1st Armored 1st Brigade in Iraq. He says all the girls do is bitch about the sand getting everywhere.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by JimP on Feb 12, 2006, 10:51am
Having read this, I can only say one thing. Getting married is a bad idea, but joining the military is a worse idea by at least an order of magnitude.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 10:58am
Feb 12, 2006, 10:07am, a sailor wrote:You should see the Navy! There are a series of COs who have been relieved of their command because they let the whore houses run on board ship. There are a number of female “sailors” who make a nice living at sea. You should hear the stories!
I was watching a “show” recently about life on an aircraft carrier. They followed several soldiers around, and what struck me was a female who complained that one thing she regrets on the ship is she could not walk around naked!!! She said in California where she is from, she could do that! Insane!!! No military can be efficient and focus on the mission with this type of set up. In fact, I cannot think of a more devious sabotage any enemy can do to us than “women in the military”. Just insane.
To all military men here: Thank you!
One last comment: you are much better off to jerk off than screw such skanks – even after months in the desert.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 11:11am
Feb 12, 2006, 10:32am, phil wrote:Thanks for serving our country. It must be terribly difficult and disheartening fighting to protect/preserve the freedom of worthless piece of shit trash American Women. Fuck AW!
Fight for men; we will beat this cancer known as AW.
I fight to protect my family back in the states.
JimP – If I had to do it all over again, I’d join the military in a heart beat. I am damn proud to serve and although many liberals won’t admit to how evil and violent mankind is, the military is and always will be necessary. It’s not perfect but I’d have to work with women no matter what line of business I went into. We do have to pick up the slack that most of the women create but unless our country quits being a bunch of pussies and kicks the women out of the military then there is nothing that can be done about it. The military should be made up of the physically strongest, bravest, and most emotionally stable people. That doesn’t exactly describe your average women does it?
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by JimP on Feb 12, 2006, 11:40am
Feb 12, 2006, 11:11am, Another military guy wrote:
Feb 12, 2006, 10:32am, phil wrote:Thanks for serving our country. It must be terribly difficult and disheartening fighting to protect/preserve the freedom of worthless piece of shit trash American Women. Fuck AW!
Fight for men; we will beat this cancer known as AW.I fight to protect my family back in the states.
JimP – If I had to do it all over again, I’d join the military in a heart beat. I am damn proud to serve and although many liberals won’t admit to how evil and violent mankind is, the military is and always will be necessary. It’s not perfect but I’d have to work with women no matter what line of business I went into. We do have to pick up the slack that most of the women create but unless our country quits being a bunch of pussies and kicks the women out of the military then there is nothing that can be done about it. The military should be made up of the physically strongest, bravest, and most emotionally stable people. That doesn’t exactly describe your average women does it?
First of all, to all the men in the military on this board, thank you. You’re absolutely right, the military is necessary. So thank you for protecting us.
However, and this is where it gets tricky, from a personal cost/benefit analysis joining the military is a horribly bad idea. So in order to join, you must derive some moral satisfaction from knowing you’re protecting your country. However, this pre-supposes that the country is yours and it’s worth protecting.
Whether or not the U.S. is worth protecting is something that is beside the point. What is clearly true, is that the country is no longer yours if you’re a male.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 12:14pm
Feb 12, 2006, 11:40am, JimP wrote:
Feb 12, 2006, 11:11am, Another military guy wrote:I fight to protect my family back in the states.
JimP – If I had to do it all over again, I’d join the military in a heart beat. I am damn proud to serve and although many liberals won’t admit to how evil and violent mankind is, the military is and always will be necessary. It’s not perfect but I’d have to work with women no matter what line of business I went into. We do have to pick up the slack that most of the women create but unless our country quits being a bunch of pussies and kicks the women out of the military then there is nothing that can be done about it. The military should be made up of the physically strongest, bravest, and most emotionally stable people. That doesn’t exactly describe your average women does it?
First of all, to all the men in the military on this board, thank you. You’re absolutely right, the military is necessary. So thank you for protecting us.
However, and this is where it gets tricky, from a personal cost/benefit analysis joining the military is a horribly bad idea. So in order to join, you must derive some moral satisfaction from knowing you’re protecting your country. However, this pre-supposes that the country is yours and it’s worth protecting.
Whether or not the U.S. is worth protecting is something that is beside the point. What is clearly true, is that the country is no longer yours if you’re a male.
I think the problem is that we don’t elect enough single guys who have viewpoints similiar to ours into office. If we did get them elected our liberal/democratic media would try to destroy them but if we stood behind them then they may have a chance. Maybe we can get the laws of our nation to be more equal for both sexes if we can get somebody to vote for our causes instead of saying what ever is politically correct. We can’t hold public office while in the military but maybe somebody else on this board or one of the other MRA boards should step up and try to get in a public office. I’d vote for them and I can get many others to vote for them also. I’m not so willing to concede that male’s have lost this country.
I am a military and history buff. My father sparked my interest in this. Almost every male in my family has been in the military. Most during the major wars of the 1900s. I am proud to follow in their footsteps. But I do admit that occasionally I wake up in the current crap hole that I live in and think to myself “what the hell am I doing here.” But overall I belive in and enjoy what I am doing and due to what I see versus what the average US citizen sees, I know that either I or somebody else needs to be here.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 12:22pm
Can you please tell us your opinion of how capable is the U.S. military to batle Iran???
Here is the latest report by Negroponte and is not very encouraging:
Iran is prepared to retaliate, experts warn
P.S. As for picking the slack – FUCK THAT!
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 12:34pm
Feb 12, 2006, 12:22pm, King Karan wrote:Can you please tell us your opinion of how capable is the U.S. military to batle Iran???
Here is the latest report by Negroponte and is not very encouraging:
Iran is prepared to retaliate, experts warn
P.S. As for picking the slack – FUCK THAT!
Well, Iraq was able to hang with Iran for a war that lasted for quite a while in the 80s. We twice kicked the crap out of Iraq like they were nothing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War
I haven’t studied Iran’s current capabilities enough to make an informed judgement and even if I had I probably couldn’t post that info on the Internet.
As far as the slack thing, can you name me one job that women work in where the men around them don’t have to pick up their slack? Ok maybe at a female strip club but anywhere else?
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 12:48pm
I am just saying that I will not be picking up slack, period! Especially if I am in a war zone. Equality you know.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 12:59pm
Forgot: the U.S. is currently preparing action against Iran and I sure as hell hope you guys are ready. China and Russia certainly want to exaust us and strech us thin before any move from their side.
The issue with the cartoons of the islamic pedophile opened the minds of the Europeans a bit. Yesterday, the islamists were demonstrating in Teheran and attacked the French Embassy, in Egypt in 5 cities, in Bangladesh, in India, the Albanians in Macedonia, the islamists in Novi Pazar in Serbia, in Sarajevo the day before, and continue today.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Richie Rich on Feb 12, 2006, 1:22pm
Former military man myself. 90% of the AW in the US Army in Texas were rejects of the streets and farms. They know the ratio of men is insane compared to women and thus they join for the advantage. Many were selling condoms for $150 during deployment in the Persian gulf(First gulf war), of course this is a sanitized way of selling their asses and not getting caught.
Everyone knew what the real deal was. I still can not believe how UGLY women get worshiped in the military but what the heck, desperation can alter a man’s sane judgment.Even worse how how slutty military women really are. Many military men have a foolish idea that since she is American that they are more comfortable having sex with them than the local women who are far better IMHO.
I never had sex with any enlisted woman, only the civilian women caught my attention because they looked better and had more decency than the nasty AW soldier woman. These women can never compete even with the local civilian skank!!
To all still deployed in the “Miserable East”, my prayers go to all of you. Keep safe and stay focused!!!
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 12, 2006, 1:32pm
If a war started that involved so many major players (China and Russia) it is not only us military guys that would have to be ready. It would be something that affected all Americans.
All of us have had to sit through history classes in regular school and in college. What theme is consistent in all of history? Extreme violence between different cultures and countries! We (the US) have dominated the world enough since WWII that it hasn’t been too bad. But mark my words. The way things are getting between Muslims and Christianity a major conflict is not far off. We had primitive weapons in WWII compared to what we have today. WWII still resulted in 62 MILLION deaths of men, women, and children. Think about what the next real major war between super powers will result in. It could be in the hundreds of millions if not billions of deaths. Our media freaks out about the 2200 deaths in Iraq over the last 3 years. That number of losses is almost unheard of during a major conflict.
Sep 11 2001 happened and everyone freaked out and is still freaked out. And rightfully so. But I think it illustrates how unprepared the US is in dealing with a large loss of human life.
137 out of every 1000 Russians died as a result of WWII (did I already say this). 23.1 million out of 168 million Russians who were alive died!!!!! I don’t think any of us can possibly imagine this type of loss of life. We are such fucking pussies that if we started losing this type of number of people we would probably collapse and surrender to whoever we are fighting.
The media loves to say how much the US spends on military defense versus education and health care. There is a reason for this. Anyone who really knows anything and is in power knows that the shit could easily hit the fan and millions of lives could be lost.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by niceguy78 on Feb 12, 2006, 2:00pm
I just wanted to address the Iran situation.
Scares the living shit out of me personally. Iran is like Iraq x’s 10.
1st they are getting help from China and Russia.
2nd It would basically just be the USA, UK, and maybe Aussie.
3rd Iran would be one solid nation fighitng to NOT BE OCCUPIED. Instead of 1/3 okay with us, and 1/3 doing this, and another 1/3 doing that. Iran would be 70,000,000 pissed off people defending their home.
4th Iraq had military sanctions for 12 years before we went to war to make their military weak. Iran has had no such sanctions. Not only can they guerilla style fight us, but they can fight us some what man up.
5th There are already 3,000,000 Persians living in the USA. What will they do if we bomb their families and friends?
6th Our military is already wearing down. Basically been in some kind of war since 9/11/01. And I wouldn’t want to rely on a draft from our very pussified society.
Scarey I tell you.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 2:37pm
Several corrections:
1st Iran is getting help from China and Russia, but Russia may turn as she herself is affected by the muslim radicals threatening to cut off its south.
2nd it would be the U.S. alone and Israel, as Iran will retaliate against Israel the way Saddam did to make the conflicet regional.
3rd 24 million Iranians are actually Azeris, and Azerbaijan hates Iran because Iran divided Azerbaijan with Russia (Russia still controlls Armenia which is the party in the Nagorno Karabakh region with Azerbaijan).
Also, we wil try to destroy their facilities there (and do a regime change there), not occupy them.
4th Iran is surrounded for all practical purposes, and while there are no sanctions against them officially, they have felt isolated. The bad thing is that the European Union has been boosting the regime by doing trade and tech exchanges with Iran.
Iran’a army is not strong weapons wise, but it is fanatical. It is worrysome if they had bought S300 anti-aircraft from Russia and long-range missiles from North Korea – which can damage (not neutralize) our air force and hit targets in the region, even in Europe.
5th There are 2.5 million Iranians abroad, of which a million in the USA. If they do something, there is the WW2 precedent with the Japanese. 
6th We have been at war since 1999 against Serbia on behalf of the Albanian Muslims in Kosovo – a terrible mistake! — but other argue we have been in a permanent war.
All this would not matter that much if we are not rotting on the inside — the issues that the poser noted, here including the lack of society’s will to fight. Yes, the pussification is a huge problem. Winners are those who have the will to win.
Scarey I tell you.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Guest on Feb 12, 2006, 2:53pm
Feb 12, 2006, 9:29am, khankrumthebulgar wrote:I have extreme views about Feminists. I have two Sisters who I have threatened to shoot.
What the fuck is it with you constantly threatening to shoot people? Are you such a chickenshit that you have to hide behind a gun? Does it make you feel like a badass to threaten to shoot people? I’m a big 2nd ammendment supporter, I own about 10 firearms myself, but I believe in responsible gun ownership. I would never threaten to “shoot” somebody just because they disagree with me on politics or feminism or whatever. What the fuck is wrong with you? If I could do something about it I’d see to it that you had your guns taken away, you are obviously too mentally unstable to be a responsible gun owner. Get a pair of balls and quit threatening to shoot everybody who disagrees with you ….
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Phil on Feb 12, 2006, 3:36pm
Waiting patiently for the ‘Unknown Martyr’ to respond with his threat from his religion of peace.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Willie Molson on Feb 12, 2006, 3:44pm
Actually, Iraq was not able to hang with Iran during the Iraq-Iran war of the 80s. Even though the Iranian officer corps was decimated by the late Ayatollah Khomeini to eradicate opposition to his regime, the Iranians were on the verge of a decisive victory against Iraq until 1) We furnish Hussein with chemical agents of increased lethality and 2) We supplied the Hussein regime with military surveillance intelligence from our spy satellites.
In my opinion, attacking Iran would be disastrous. Outside of Israel, they have the best military in the Middle East, and, unlike Hussein, Iran has terrorist allies around the world. A military strike should only be engaged in if the Iranians foolishly attack Israel or our forces first. Ahmadinejad may seem crazy, but he isn’t that crazy.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by King Karan on Feb 12, 2006, 4:29pm
Sorry, Ahmadinejad IS that crazy! He actually believes in the prophecy of the 12th imam Mehdi or some such islamic nutcase scenario about the “end times” i.e. that he needs to bring about the end:
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060205-100341-6320r.htm
And do read the link I gave above, it is a glimpse of what U.S. intel believes Iran will do militarily (medium range missiles, terrorism against Americans worldwide through Hezbollah in Lebanon and similar satellites, etc.)
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Willie Molson on Feb 12, 2006, 4:44pm
Karan, I know about the Mehdi apocalyptic scenario, and I read the piece. I have a lot of respect for de Borchgrave. Here’s the deal though. I believe Iran already has fully assembled nuclear weapons, and is in the process of incorporating the weapons onto their missiles. All because of A.Q. Khan.
Heck, if Al Qaeda has nuclear weapons, and most knowledgeable intelligence agencies believe they do, it stands to reason that Iran has the weapons too.
You’re right. I forgot about the Mehdi shit. He is crazy enough to attack Israel.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by niceguy78 on Feb 12, 2006, 5:54pm
I honestly feel that if we attack Iran at this point in time, it will truly be the beginning of the end for the USA. That is how much it scares me.
I would say the beginning of the end would have been the feminist movements of the 60’s and 70’s, but after this 9/11, and then the cherry on top being attacking Iran.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by JimF on Feb 12, 2006, 6:18pm
Feb 12, 2006, 5:54pm, niceguy78 wrote:I honestly feel that if we attack Iran at this point in time, it will truly be the beginning of the end for the USA. That is how much it scares me.
Why do you think this? We have the best military in the world. We will hand the Iranians asses to them. I say bring it on, and let’s do it! Let’s teach these ragheads a lesson!
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Richie Rich on Feb 12, 2006, 6:20pm
….Is anybody forgetting North Korea here???
They are just as volatile as the Persians. Pissed off poor people with weaponry are not afraid to die. Remember the US threatening sanctions on them, they boldly stated “sanctions equal war”. The US has not sad a peep of a word to them since!!!
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by niceguy78 on Feb 12, 2006, 6:25pm
Feb 12, 2006, 6:18pm, JimF wrote:
Feb 12, 2006, 5:54pm, niceguy78 wrote:I honestly feel that if we attack Iran at this point in time, it will truely be the beginning of the end for the USA. That is how much it scares me.Why do you think this? We have the best military in the world. We will hand the Iranians asses to them. I say bring it on, and let’s do it! Let’s teach these ragheads a lesson!
If our military was so “strong” why are we still are going on year Number 5 with a group that doesn’t even have a military?
Is our military strong enough to prevent another country from invading us? Hell yes.
But we are talking about invading another country. And not only our military is worn down, but our society has become so weak and feminized that I do not believe we stand a chance.
Who are we going to draft? A bunch of maginas and the worthless USA women to help? How would this even help, other than to spread terrorism further?
Our best bet is to finish Iraq (a long ways to go) and keep hunting for Usama, and let the world (hope to god) keep an eye on Iran.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by JimP on Feb 12, 2006, 9:07pm
For those interested in military matters, check out this link, it’s funny, but true: http://www.exile.ru/2006-January-27/2006_war_preview.html (click on the browse author or previous buttons).
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by JimP on Feb 12, 2006, 9:27pm
Feb 12, 2006, 12:14pm, Another military guy wrote:
Feb 12, 2006, 11:40am, JimP wrote:First of all, to all the men in the military on this board, thank you. You’re absolutely right, the military is necessary. So thank you for protecting us.
However, and this is where it gets tricky, from a personal cost/benefit analysis joining the military is a horribly bad idea. So in order to join, you must derive some moral satisfaction from knowing you’re protecting your country. However, this pre-supposes that the country is yours and it’s worth protecting.
Whether or not the U.S. is worth protecting is something that is beside the point. What is clearly true, is that the country is no longer yours if you’re a male.
I think the problem is that we don’t elect enough single guys who have viewpoints similiar to ours into office. If we did get them elected our liberal/democratic media would try to destroy them but if we stood behind them then they may have a chance. Maybe we can get the laws of our nation to be more equal for both sexes if we can get somebody to vote for our causes instead of saying what ever is politically correct. We can’t hold public office while in the military but maybe somebody else on this board or one of the other MRA boards should step up and try to get in a public office. I’d vote for them and I can get many others to vote for them also. I’m not so willing to concede that male’s have lost this country.
I am a military and history buff. My father sparked my interest in this. Almost every male in my family has been in the military. Most during the major wars of the 1900s. I am proud to follow in their footsteps. But I do admit that occasionally I wake up in the current crap hole that I live in and think to myself “what the hell am I doing here.” But overall I belive in and enjoy what I am doing and due to what I see versus what the average US citizen sees, I know that either I or somebody else needs to be here.
I think the country is WAAAY to far gone in order for the political system to work. Women are both a special interest group and the majority of the voters. I freely admit that I’m a pessimist at heart; I’m saying that in my opinion, the only thing for men to do is to adopt the communist policy of “the worse, the better”.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by truth prophetic on Feb 12, 2006, 10:05pm
Feb 12, 2006, 9:27pm, JimP wrote:
I think the country is WAAAY to far gone in order for the political system to work. Women are both a special interest group and the majority of the voters. I freely admit that I’m a pessimist at heart; I’m saying that in my opinion, the only thing for men to do is to adopt the communist policy of “the worse, the better”.
I agree. Things will have to get worse – much worse – before they start to get better. Start making plans to go expat, guys. That’s where the best front row seats are.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by khankrumthebulgar on Feb 13, 2006, 9:22am
Lets see my Son is fighting in Fallujah while his Aunts are sending Money to the Terrorists that are trying to kill him. No problem there eh Guest? Fuck you. If it was your Son I would suggest you would pissed as well. You can kiss my hairy ass if you don’t like it.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Guest on Feb 13, 2006, 11:34am
Feb 13, 2006, 9:22am, khankrumthebulgar wrote:Lets see my Son is fighting in Fallujah while his Aunts are sending Money to the Terrorists that are trying to kill him. No problem there eh Guest? Fuck you. If it was your Son I would suggest you would pissed as well. You can kiss my hairy ass if you don’t like it.
I’d be pissed, but being a mature, rational, responsible adult I would not threaten to shoot the cunts. And that’s exactly what you said you did, you said you threatened to shoot them. Every other goddamned post you make you’re threatening to shoot somebody. Grow up and quit hiding behind a gun, chickenshit.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Willie Molson on Feb 13, 2006, 1:24pm
Rich, I make a distinction between the threat likelihood from North Korea and the one from Iran, and I believe our policymakers make a distinction as well.
The North Korean dictator just wants to hold onto power. When President Bush made that ill-advised allusion to North Korea as being a part of an axis of evil, and they saw what happened to Iraq, they started posturing to let the U.S. know they would pay a heavy price if they attempted to topple their regime.
In Iran, you have a fanatical ideology forming the foundation for a nation-state, a nation-state that has had a historical alliance with some of the most vicious terrorists in history. Beheadings, sharia laws, etc.
North Korea is not going to attack American interests militarily, but Iran, because of its fatalistic messianic ideology, just might. That’s why the U.S. has the kind of world support in this case that they lacked in the run up to the Iraq War, in my opinion.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by billb on Feb 13, 2006, 2:06pm
Feb 13, 2006, 11:34am, Guest wrote:
Feb 13, 2006, 9:22am, khankrumthebulgar wrote:Lets see my Son is fighting in Fallujah while his Aunts are sending Money to the Terrorists that are trying to kill him. No problem there eh Guest? Fuck you. If it was your Son I would suggest you would pissed as well. You can kiss my hairy ass if you don’t like it.I’d be pissed, but being a mature, rational, responsible adult I would not threaten to shoot the cunts. And that’s exactly what you said you did, you said you threatened to shoot them. Every other goddamned post you make you’re threatening to shoot somebody. Grow up and quit hiding behind a gun, chickenshit.
zero credibility troll hiding as “Guest”
grow up and quit hiding behind “Guest” chickenshit
Khan would eat your fucking head for breakfast.
Cunt
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by lurker on Feb 15, 2006, 10:58pm
Iran does not consist of 70,000,000 fanatical muslims. They actually consist of about 70% of their population being under the age of 25, thanks to the Iran-Iraq war, and most of those young people would just as soon see the ayatollahs topple. That may be the ONLY reason we haven’t invaded yet – there is a good chance regime change will happen from the inside. And, as far as the Iranians in the US go, most of them are in the US because the fanatical muslims chased them out in 1979, and they took refuge here. If we did invade, the US resident Iranians would mostly be cheering us on.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by RBK on Feb 16, 2006, 3:33am
You think AW’s actually in the military are bad? Think about the wives of those soldiers busting their a**es in Iraq etc. As soon as a husband/boyfriend gets deployed, it’s an automatic carte blanche to f*ck around for the vast majority of their women, including the foreign ones. I grew up in a military environment, and I spent a lot of time at the Enlisted club and hanging out with soldiers off-base. You should hear some of the horror stories they have! Not only that, but you can actually witness the phenomenon as you see the married women prowl the dorms, if you happen to be at a dorm party. On particularly poignant example I can immediately think of was married and raising a toddler child that did not belong to him. She never held a job, took a year to come to Germany where he was stationed, they were legally separated for a while because she accused him of cheating on her (which he didn’t, as a matter of fact, it was vice versa) and then when the money ran low for her again, she begged him to take her back, which he stupidly did (I suspect this was out of some sort of loyalty to the child involved). At any rate, she comes back (on his money, not the gov’s) and he gets multiple short-term deployments. Because he ends up being out of town so much, he makes the horrendous mistake of giving her a general power of attorney because paperwork needed to be signed that he for one reason or another couldn’t take care of while away.
Guess what she did? She fucked around on him, bought a new SUV IN HIS NAME (so that he would ever-after have to pay the bill for it), and took out 2 loans (each over 4 grand), also in his name.
Not to mention that she didn’t cook, didn’t clean, and did a terrible job of raising her illegitimate child. Any day that he came home, he would have to cook dinner, clean up after her, make sure the kid was doing alright and listen to her complaints against him. She always took more than an hour to get ready to even go to the grocery store (if such a miracle ever occurred), spent incredible amounts of money on useless crap like candles and makeup. Plus, she b*tched every time he went out with his friends, hacked into his email, checked his cell, etc etc.
Thankfully, he divorced the b*tch and as they were married for less than five years, she didn’t get any alimony, and he doesn’t have to pay child support because the kid isn’t his. Guess he lucked out on that one…even if he’s still paying off those loans, and the car was repossessed, thereby screwing his credit. As far as I know, the kid now lives with grandma, and she still doesn’t have a job. At any rate, that little gem is fairly benign compared to some of the other ones I’ve heard.
Typically, young men in the military marry because they get stationed somewhere like Germany or Japan or such and they don’t want to break up with their girlfriends. It almost always ends up in total disaster.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 16, 2006, 5:37am
Feb 16, 2006, 3:33am, RBK wrote:You think AW’s actually in the military are bad? Think about the wives of those soldiers busting their a**es in Iraq etc.
Typically, young men in the military marry because they get stationed somewhere like Germany or Japan or such and they don’t want to break up with their girlfriends. It almost always ends up in total disaster.
Great post RBK. Women are children and need constant attention. If the man gets sent overseas, it is like leaving a little kid home alone. The wife may behave for a while but eventually they get bored or feel ignored by the husband who is off fighting a war and they cheat.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Lurker on Feb 16, 2006, 9:42am
I live near a military base. Yes Virginia, the wives screw around a lot.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by kilg on Feb 16, 2006, 10:17am
are military man + military woman marriages anymore successful?
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Willie Molson on Feb 16, 2006, 11:03am
I would be very leery of postulating that if we invade Iran Iranians, whether old or young, expatriate or within the country, would support us. Think about it vicariously. Many, many, people loathe Bush, particularly in this part of the country. However, should a foreign entity ever attempted to invade the U.S., the Blue/Red divide would evaporate, and the nation would become one to expel the invader.
One of the things that hasn’t been really dwelled upon is the Iranian response to any military attack on them by the U.S., or Israel, for that matter. The Iranians know they don’t have the military sophistication to send smart bombs and the such into battle. We are talking about asymmetrical warfare supreme, and you can bet that Iranian military people have war-gamed how to maximize maximum damage to American interests in the region and around the world.
Remember this too. The Iranians may be Islamic, but they aren’t Arab. They’re Persian. As I have said before, they have the best military in the Middle East, and, if the Israelis didn’t receive a tremendous amount of American military and resource largesse, they would have the best military in the region. We attack them at our peril.
——————————————————————————–
Re: Deployment Princesses – Extreme AW behavior
Post by Another military guy on Feb 16, 2006, 11:10pm
Feb 16, 2006, 10:17am, kilg wrote:are military man + military woman marriages anymore successful?
No. They are much worse. It can as much as double the amount of time the spouses spend away from each other. If one spouse is sent on a deployment, they usually won’t send the other one at the same time. Especially if they have kids. So basically the female military member will either be deployed somewhere surrounded by a bunch of horny guys or she will be back home by herself surrounded by a bunch of horny guys.
——————————————————————————–
